双任务干预改善健康老年人平衡功能效益的系统综述

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2022.12.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To conduct systematic review on the benefits of dual-task intervention on balance function for healthy aged people.

Methods The Web of Science core collection, PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang database were searched for randomized controlled trial (RCTs) on the effects of dual-task interventions on balance function in healthy aged people from January 1st, 2010, to November, 2022. The quality of the literature was evaluated with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Literature screening, data extraction, and risk bias assessment were performed by two researchers based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results Fourteen RCTs of dual-task interventions for balance function in healthy older adults from ten countries with a total of 1 279 healthy aged people from the research fields of sport psychology, exercise rehabilitation, and geriatric rehabilitation were finally included. The mean score of the PEDro scale was 7.85. The main types of dual-task modalities for balance function interventions for aged people were motor-cognitive, motor-motor and cognitive-cognitive. Within these, the main motor intervention modalities were physical fitness such as balance training and strength training, and motor skill such as postural control and gait exercises. Motor-cognitive dual-task interventions referred to simultaneously performing motor and cognitive skills exercises, such as memory, attention and executive functions. Motor-motor dual-task interventions referred to simultaneously performing motor and second motor exercises, such as object-holding exercises and daily routines. Cognitive-cognitive dual-task interventions referred to simultaneously performing two cognitive exercises. The efftects of dual-task intervention model on balance function of aged people might be in three aspects. (1) Balance function: maintaining standing posture and moving oneself. (2) Balance function-related physical fitness: lower limb muscle strength functions, etc. (3) Balance function-related mental and overall health functioning: single-task walking, dual-task walking, daily life, falling possibility, fear of falling, balance confidence, etc.

Conclusion Both dual-task and single-task intervention modes could improve the balance function and related physical fitness of healthy aged people, improve the stability of standing posture and self-mobility, improve the strength and function of lower limbs, and reduce the risk of falls and psychological fear. In particular, the dual-task intervention model is superior to the single-task intervention model in improving dual-task balance control performance, and was more able to improve the ability of daily living and overall health development.

Key words: dual-task intervention, healthy aged people, balance function, systematic review

CLC Number:

R493

LAN Wencen,ZHANG Danxuan,WANG Bin. Benefits of dual-task intervention on balance function for healthy aged people: a systematic review[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2022, 28(12): 1426-1434.

Figures/Tables 4

纳入文献	国家	样本特征	纳入人群	身体活动干预策略/处方	比较	康复结局指标
Wollesen等^[7](2017)	德国	T1(n = 29)：双任务，(70.7±4.9)岁 T2(n = 23)：单任务运动，(71.7±4.9)岁 T3(n = 26)：对照组，(73.7±5.0)岁	具有独立生活能力、无重大疾病、无慢性病的老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：12周。③干预频次：每周1次。④干预地点：体育馆。⑤干预内容：单任务运动进行力量训练；双任务进行多种双任务力量训练。	与单任务运动干预相比，双任务干预更有利于增加单任务步态中的步长和步态线，双任务步态中的步长。	从事多项任务(d220) 跌倒感(b2402) 步行(d450)
Akin等^[18](2021)	土耳其	T1(n = 25)：运动-认知双任务，(65.88±4.58)岁 T2(n=25)：运动-运动双任务， (69.56±9.03)岁	无平衡障碍史、无重大疾病的老年人	①干预时间：40 min。②干预周期：8周。③干预频次：未提及。④干预地点：未提及。⑤干预内容：运动-认知双任务在姿势控制练习的同时进行递减计算任务；运动-运动双任务在姿势控制练习的同时进行持物练习。	与运动-认知双任务干预相比，运动-运动双任务干预更有利于改善股四头肌、双侧腓肠肌和胫骨前肌等肌力；两种训练在改善功能性移动和跌倒恐惧方面无显著性差异。	跌倒感(b2402) 下肢肌肉力量功能(b7303) 移动自身(d420)
Azadian等^[19](2016)	伊朗	T1(n = 10)：运动-认知双任务， (73.9±5.5) 岁 T2(n = 10)：单任务认知，(73.8±3.9)岁 C(n = 10)：(73.7±4.4)岁	无平衡障碍的老年人	①干预时间：45 min。②干预周期：8周。③干预频次：每周3次，④干预地点：未提及。⑤干预内容：运动-认知在姿势控制和步态练习时进行递增负荷认知干预；单任务认知进行执行功能训练。	双任务和单任务认知训练改善步态的时空参数；与双任务相比，单任务认知训练更有利于改善步速、步长时间和支撑时间。	步态功能(b770)
Barban等^[20](2017)	意大利	T1(n = 121)：运动-认知双任务，(74.5±7.9)岁 T2(n = 118)：单任务认知，(74.1±7.2)岁 T3(n = 119)：单任务运动，(75.5±8.5)岁 C(n = 123)：(76±8.8)岁	具有跌倒风险的老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：12周。③干预频次：每周2次。④干预地点：居家/医院。⑤干预内容：单任务运动进行平衡和步态训练；单任务认知进行执行功能和注意训练；运动-认知双任务连续完成运动和认知练习；对照组进行简单认知练习。	双任务和单任务运动干预均能提高平衡和步态能力，减少跌倒恐惧。各指标在训练间无显著性差异。	跌倒感(b2402) 移动自身(d420)
Bischoff等^[21](2021)	德国	T(n = 14)：认知-运动双任务， (83.6±7.3)岁 C(n = 10)：(83.8±5.7)岁	具有一定认知行为和行动能力的老年人	①干预时间：45~60 min。②干预周期：16周。③干预频次：每周2次。④干预地点：养老院。⑤干预内容：运动认知双任务进行平衡、力量和耐力练习时进行认知游戏干预。	双任务干预提高下肢功能。	下肢肌肉力量功能(b7303)
Brustio等^[22](2018)	意大利	T1(n = 22)：运动-运动双任务， (74.3±2.6)岁 T2(n = 19)：单任务运动，(75.2±3.4)岁 C(n = 60)：(74±3.2)岁	具有独立生活能力、认知能力、无重大疾病的老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：16周。③干预频次：每周2次。④干预地点：未提及。⑤干预内容：单任务运动进行平衡和步行练习；运动-运动双任务在平衡和步行练习时进行日常事务练习。	双任务干预提高动态平衡。步速在双任务和单任务运动干预间无显著性差异。	从事多项任务(d220) 移动自身(d420) 步行(d450)
Eggenberger等^[23](2015)	瑞士	T1(n = 22)：运动-认知双任务， (78.5±5.1)岁 T2(n = 24)：舞蹈，(77.3±6.3)岁 T3(n = 25)：单任务运动，(80.8±4.7)岁	具有独立生活能力、无行走障碍的老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：26周。③干预频次：每周2次。④干预地点：医院。⑤干预内容：舞蹈进行虚拟视频舞蹈；单任务运动进行步行练习；运动-认知双任务在步行练习的同时进行记忆练习。	舞蹈和双任务干预提高下肢功能、步速和步长，降低步态变异性跌倒恐惧和跌倒频率。各指标在训练间无显著性差异。	从事多项任务(d220) 跌倒感(b2402) 下肢肌肉力量功能(b7303) 步行(d450)
Jehu等^[24](2017)	加拿大	T1(n = 15)：运动-运动双任务， (68.7±5.5)岁 T2(n = 24)：单任务运动，(70.2±6.3)岁 C(n = 12)：(66.7±4.2)岁	健康老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：12周。③干预频次：每周3次。④干预地点：未提及。⑤干预内容：单任务运动进行平衡和步行练习；运动-认知双任务在平衡和步行练习时进行持物练习。	双任务和单任务运动干预均提高单任务和双任务条件下的动态平衡，各指标在训练间无显著性差异。	从事多项任务(d220) 移动自身(d420)
Laatar等^[25](2018)	突尼斯	T1(n = 12)：双任务，(66.29±3.61)岁 T2(n = 12)：单任务运动(67.45±2.38)岁	能独立行走、无重大疾病的老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：12周。③干预频次：每周3次。④干预地点：未提及。⑤干预内容：单任务运动进行平衡练习；双任务在平衡练习时进行认知或持物练习。	双任务和单任务运动干预均能减少姿势摆动，提高动态平衡、下肢力量和耐力和功能性移动性。双任务比单任务运动干预更能提高步速。	下肢肌肉力量功能(b7303) 保持站姿(b4154) 移动自身(d420) 步行(d450) 自理(d5)
Javadpour等^[26](2022)	伊朗	T1(n = 23)：运动-认知双任务，(68.86±3.48)岁 T2(n = 23)：单任务运动， (67.65±2.42)岁 C(n = 23)：(69.34±3.77)岁	能够独立行走、无重大疾病的老年人	①干预时间：40~60 min。②干预周期：6周。③干预频次：每周3次。④干预地点：未提及。⑤干预内容：单任务运动进行步行练习；运动-认知双任务在步态练习时进行递减任务。	双任务和单任务运动干预均能提高站姿稳定性、步速、步态稳定、跌倒恐惧和平衡信心。各指标在训练干预间无显著性差异。	从事多项任务(d220) 跌倒感(b2402) 保持站姿(b4154) 移动自身(d420) 步行(d450)
Rezola-Pardo等^[27](2019)	西班牙	T1(n = 42)：运动-认知双任务， (84.9±6.7)岁 T2(n = 43)：单任务运动， (85.3±7.1)岁	具有独立行走能力老年人	①干预时间：40~60 min。②干预周期：6周。③干预频次：每周3次。④干预地点：健身房。⑤干预内容：单任务运动进行力量和平衡训练；运动-认知双任务在力量和平衡训练时进行注意、执行功能和记忆练习。	双任务和单任务运动干预均能提高步速和下肢功能，单任务运动干预更有利于改善下肢功能。	从事多项任务(d220) 下肢肌肉力量功能(b7303) 移动自身(d420) 步行(d450)
Trombini-Souza等^[28](2022)	巴西	T1(n = 30)：固定焦点的双任务， (67±5)岁 T2(n = 30)：可变焦点的双任务， (66±4)岁	无慢性疾病、能够独立行走的老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：24周。③干预频次：每周2次。④干预地点：健身房。⑤干预内容：改变注意焦点的双任务练习。	两组双任务干预均能减少跌倒恐惧，提高平衡信心。各指标在训练干预间无显著性差异。	跌倒感(b2402)
Wollesen等^[29](2017)	德国	T1(n = 26)：运动-认知双任务， (72.2±4.6)岁 T2(n = 30)：运动-认知双任务， (69.8±5.7)岁 C1(n = 19)：(72.9±4.4)岁 C2(n = 20)：(72.7±5.3)岁	具有独立生活能力、能够独立行走、无重大疾病的老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：12周。③干预频次：每周1次。④干预地点：体育馆。⑤干预内容：运动-认知双任务在步行同时进行执行功能等练习。	双任务干预可增加高跌倒恐惧者的步态线，减少跌倒恐惧水平。	从事多项任务(d220) 跌倒感(b2402) 步行(d450)
Wongcharoen等^[30](2017)	泰国	T1(n = 15)：运动-认知双任务，(71.87±4.57)岁 T2(n = 15)：认知-认知双任务，(74.73±5.97)岁 T3(n = 15)：单任务运动， (73.53±5.94)岁 T4(n = 15)：单任务认知，(72.4±6.3)岁	无任何影响行走疾病的老年人	①干预时间：60 min。②干预周期：4周。③干预频次：每周3次。④干预地点：体育馆。⑤干预内容：单任务运动进行姿势控制练习；单任务认知进行步态相关的认知练习；运动-认知双任务同时执行上述运动训练和认知练习；认知-认知双任务进行两项认知练习。	运动-认知双任务干预可增加步长、步速和步态稳定，认知-认知双任务干预没有改善平衡能力。	从事多项任务(d220) 步行(d450)

References 35

[1]	HAGOVSKÁ M, OLEKSZYOVÁ Z. Impact of the combination of cognitive and balance training on gait, fear and risk of falling and quality of life in seniors with mild cognitive impairment[J]. Geriatr Gerontol Int, 2016, 16(9): 1043-1050. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12593 pmid: 26338465
[2]	郭静霞, 陈亮, 余启超, 等. 运动对预防老年人跌倒效果的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2021, 27(5): 563-573.
	GUO J X, CHEN L, YU Q C, et al. Efficacy of exercise on fall in old adults: a network meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2021, 27(5): 563-573.
[3]	康宁, 于海军, 陆晓敏, 等. 中国老年人跌倒发生率的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(10): 1142-1148.
	KANG N, YU H J, LU X M, et al. The rate of falls in Chinese elderly: a meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2022, 22(10): 1142-1148.
[4]	YARDLEY L, SMITH H. A prospective study of the relationship between feared consequences of falling and avoidance of activity in community-living older people[J]. Gerontologist, 2002, 42(1): 17-23. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.1.17 pmid: 11815695
[5]	BUSCH T D A, DUARTE Y A, PIRES NUNES D, et al. Factors associated with lower gait speed among the elderly living in a developing country: a cross-sectional population-based study[J]. BMC geriatrics, 2015, 15(35): 2-9.
[6]	刘元标, 励建安. 老年人跌倒与平衡及步态异常[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(1): 5-8.
	LIU Y B, LI J A. Falls in elderly and balance and gait disorders(review)[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2012, 18(1): 5-8.
[7]	WOLLESEN B, MATTES K, SCHULZ S, et al. Effects of dual-task management and resistance training on gait performance in older individuals: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2017, 9: 415. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00415 pmid: 29326581
[8]	HRYSOMALLIS C. Relationship between balance ability, training and sports injury risk[J]. Sports Med, 2007, 37(6): 547-556. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737060-00007 pmid: 17503879
[9]	王航平, 聂真新, 孙振武, 等. 核心力量练习对中老年人平衡能力和跌倒风险预防效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(20): 5009-5015.
	WANG H P, NIE Z X, SUN Z W, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of core strength exercises on balance and fall risk prevention in middle-aged and elderly people[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2019, 39(20): 5009-5015.
[10]	李镇辉, 喻娇, 侯美金, 等. 步行双任务对健康老年人和青年人足廓清功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2020, 35(11): 1309-1315.
	LI Z H, YU J, HOU M J, et al. The effect of dual-task walking on the foot clearance in healthy elderly and healthy youth[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2020, 35(11): 1309-1315.
[11]	CHANG N T, YANG N P, CHOU P. Incidence, risk factors and consequences of falling injuries among the community-dwelling elderly in Shihpai, Taiwan[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2010, 22(1): 70-77.
[12]	黄珂, 王国祥, 邱卓英, 等. 基于ICF老年人体育活动与功能康复研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(11): 1248-1254.
	HUANG K, WANG G X, QIU Z Y, et al. Effects of physical activities on functioning and health for aging people using ICF[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2019, 25(11): 1248-1254.
[13]	YOGEV-SELIGMANN G, HAUSDORFF J M, GILADI N. The role of executive function and attention in gait[J]. Mov Disord, 2008, 23(3): 329-472.
[14]	袁媛, 杨剑. 慢性病和功能障碍老年人身体活动的健康效果:系统综述的系统综述[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2022, 28(9): 1003-1011.
	YUAN Y, YANG J. Effect of physical activity on health conditions and functioning for aging people with chronic diseases and functioning: a systematic review of systematic reviews[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2022, 28(9): 1003-1011.
[15]	DROZDOVA-STATKEVICIENE M, CESNAITIENE V J, MASIULIS N. Effect of acute strength training on the posture control during dual tasking and executive function in older adults. A randomized controlled study[J]. Int J Gerontol, 2019, 13(3): 216-220.
[16]	NOROUZI E, VAEZMOSAVI M, GERBER M, et al. Dual-task training on cognition and resistance training improved both balance and working memory in older people[J]. Phys Sportsmed, 2019, 47(4): 471-478. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2019.1623996 pmid: 31155997
[17]	HE Y, YANG L, ZHOU J, et al. Dual-task training effects on motor and cognitive functional abilities in individuals with stroke: a systematic review[J]. Clin Rehabil, 2018, 32(7): 865-877. doi: 10.1177/0269215518758482 pmid: 29473480
[18]	AKIN H, SENEL A, TASKIRAN H, et al. Do motor-cognitive and motor-motor dual task training effect differently balance performance in older adults?[J]. Eur Geriatr Med, 2021, 12(2): 371-378. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00434-8 pmid: 33389715
[19]	AZADIAN E, TORBATI H R T, KAKHKI A R S, et al. The effect of dual task and executive training on pattern of gait in older adults with balance impairment: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2016, 62(10): 83-89.
[20]	BARBAN F, ANNICCHIARICO R, MELIDEO M, et al. Reducing fall risk with combined motor and cognitive training in elderly fallers[J]. Brain Sci, 2017, 7(2): 2-14.
[21]	BISCHOFF L L, CORDES T, MEIXNER C, et al. Can cognitive-motor training improve physical functioning and psychosocial wellbeing in nursing home residents? A randomized controlled feasibility study as part of the PROCARE project[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2021, 33(4): 943-956.
[22]	BRUSTIO P R, RABAGLIETTI E, FORMICA S, et al. Dual-task training in older adults: the effect of additional motor tasks on mobility performance[J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2018, 75(12): 119-124.
[23]	EGGENBERGER P, THEILL N, HOLENSTEIN S, et al. Multicomponent physical exercise with simultaneous cognitive training to enhance dual-task walking of older adults: a secondary analysis of a 6-month randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2015, 10(10): 1711-1732.
[24]	JEHU D A, PAQUET N, LAJOIE Y. Balance and mobility training with or without concurrent cognitive training improves the Timed Up and Go (TUG), TUG cognitive, and TUG manual in healthy older adults: an exploratory study[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2017, 29(4): 711-720. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0618-2 pmid: 27538832
[25]	LAATAR R, KACHOURI H, BORJI R, et al. Combined physical-cognitive training enhances postural performances during daily life tasks in older adults[J]. Exp Gerontol, 2018, 107(7): 91-97.
[26]	JAVADPOUR S, SINAEI E, SALEHI R, et al. Comparing the effects of single-task versus dual-task balance training on gait smoothness and functional balance in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Aging Phys Act, 2022, 30(2): 308-315.
[27]	REZOLA-PARDO C, ARRIETA H, GIL S M, et al. Comparison between multicomponent and simultaneous dual-task exercise interventions in long-term nursing home residents: the Ageing-ONDUAL-TASK randomized controlled study[J]. Age Ageing, 2019, 48(6): 817-823.
[28]	TROMBINI-SOUZA F, NOGUEIRA R, SERAFIM A C B, et al. Concern about falling, confidence in balance, quality of life, and depression symptoms in community-dwelling older adults after a 24-week dual-task training with variable and fixed priority: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Res Aging, 2022, 44(9-10): 658-668.
[29]	WOLLESEN B, SCHULZ S, SEYDELL L, et al. Does dual task training improve walking performance of older adults with concern of falling?[J]. BMC Ger, 2017, 17(1): 2-6.
[30]	WONGCHAROEN S, SUNGKARAT S, MUNKHETVIT P, et al. Home-based interventions improve trained, but not novel, dual-task balance performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Gait Posture, 2017, 52(2): 147-152.
[31]	LIEPELT R, STROBACH T, FRENSCH P, et al. Improved intertask coordination after extensive dual-task practice[J]. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), 2011, 64(7): 1251-1272.
[32]	WORDEN T A, VALLIS L A. Examining transfer effects of dual-task training protocols for a complex locomotor task[J]. J Mot Behav, 2018, 50(2): 177-193.
[33]	VARELA-VáSQUEZ L A, MINOBES-MOLINA E, JEREZ-ROIG J. Dual-task exercises in older adults: a structured review of current literature[J]. J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls, 2020, 5(2): 31-37.
[34]	王琪, 毛敏, 孙威, 等. 老年人本体感觉、足底触觉和肌肉力量与姿势稳定性的关系[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2022, 28(4): 373-378.
	WANG Q, MAO M, SUN W, et al. Relationship of proprioception, cutaneous sensitivity and strength to postural stability among older adults[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2022, 28(4): 373-378.
[35]	ECKARDT N. Lower-extremity resistance training on unstable surfaces improves proxies of muscle strength, power and balance in healthy older adults: a randomised control trial[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2016, 16(1): 14-15.

纳入文献	资格标准	随机分配	分配隐藏	基线一致	被试设盲	训练设盲	评定者设盲	被试测量≥85%	意向性分析	组间统计比较	变异性测量	总分
Wollesen等^[7](2017)	是	1	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	7
Akin等^[18](2021)	是	1	1	1	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	9
Azadian等^[19](2016)	是	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	6
Barban等^[20](2017)	是	1	1	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	9
Bischoff等^[21](2021)	是	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	1	7
Brustio等^[22](2018)	是	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	7
Eggenberge等^[23](2015)	是	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	8
Jehu等^[24](2017)	是	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	8
Laatar等^[25](2018)	是	1	0	1	1	1	0	1	1	1	1	8
Javadpour等^[26](2022)	是	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	8
Rezola-Pardo等^[27](2019)	是	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	7
Trombini-Souza等^[28](2022)	是	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	10
Wollesen等^[29](2017)	是	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	8
Wongcharoen等^[30](2017)	是	1	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	8

Benefits of dual-task intervention on balance function for healthy aged people: a systematic review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 35

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WANG Hangyu, GE Keke, FAN Yonghong, DU Lilu, ZOU Min, FENG Lei. Effect of active music therapy on cognitive function for older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review based on ICD-11 and ICF [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[2]	WEN Jianing, JIN Qiuyan, ZHANG Qi, LI Jie, SI Qi. Effect of cognitively engaging physical activity on developing executive function of children and adolescents: a systematic review based on ICF [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[3]	GE Keke, FAN Yonghong, WANG Hangyu, DU Lilu, LI Changjiang, ZOU Min. Health benefit of mindfulness intervention for older adults with insomnia disorders: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[4]	ZHANG Jingya, ZOU Min, SUN Hongwei, SUN Changlong, ZHU Juntong. Effect of psychological intervention on anxiety or depression in children and adolescents with hearing impairment: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[5]	WANG Junyu, YANG Yong, YUAN Xun, XIE Ting, ZHUANG Jie. Effect of high-intensity interval training on executive function for healthy children and adolescents: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[6]	WEI Xiaowei, YANG Jian, WEI Chunyan. Psychological and behavioral benefits of adapted yoga exercise for children with autism spectrum disorder in special education schools: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[7]	YANG Yaru, YANG Jian. School-based physical activity-related health services and their health benefits within the World Health Organization health-promoting school framework: a systematic review of systematic reviews [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[8]	WANG He, HAN Liang, KAN Mengfan, YU Shaohong. Efficacy of electrical stimulation on shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(9): 1048-1056.
[9]	SHI Jiawei, LI Lingyu, YANG Haojie, WANG Qinlu, ZOU Haiou. Effect of preoperative prerehabilitation training on total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of systematic reviews [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[10]	JIANG Changhao, HUANG Chen, GAO Xiaoyan, DAI Yuanfu, ZHAO Guoming. Effect of neurofeedback training on cognitive function in the elderly: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[11]	WEI Xiaowei, YANG Jian, WEI Chunyan, HE Qiling. Adapted physical education programs for psychomotor development in school settings for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[12]	WANG Shaopu, CHEN Gang. Psychological-behavioral health services and its outcome based on World Health Organization health-promoting school framework: a systematic review of systematic reviews [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(7): 800-807.
[13]	JIANG Changhao, GAO Xiaoyan. Effect of acute physical activity on cognitive function in children: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(6): 667-672.
[14]	YU Zhongqi, WANG Chao, HE Gang, ZHANG Liang, WANG Ruiyan. Effect of short-foot exercise on adult flatfoot: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(5): 551-557.
[15]	LAN Shiling, PANG Wei, LI Xin, LIU Mengyun, ZHAN Yujun. Effect of action observation therapy on upper limb function in cerebral palsy: a systematic review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(5): 558-564.