《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 570-576.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.05.011

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

D型与非D型人格冠心病患者的健康赋权、感知控制和经验性回避特征比较

张睿琳1, 张秋敏1, 王丽娟2, 齐万鹏2, 宋玉萍1, 姜能志1, 田相娟1()   

  1. 1.山东第二医科大学心理学院,山东潍坊市 261053
    2.山东第二医科大学附属医院,山东潍坊市 261031
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-19 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 田相娟(1990-),女,汉族,山东临沂市人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向:临床心理学。田相娟,E-mail: xiangjuanti@126.com
  • 作者简介:张睿琳(1998-),女,汉族,山东烟台市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:临床心理学。
  • 基金资助:
    1.山东省自然科学基金面上项目(ZR2021MC037);2.潍坊市科技发展计划(软科学)项目(2023RKX134);3.山东省教育发展研究微课题(FH032)

Characteristics of health empowerment, perceived control and experiential avoidance in coronary heart disease patients with type D and non-type D personality

ZHANG Ruilin1, ZHANG Qiumin1, WANG Lijuan2, QI Wanpeng2, SONG Yuping1, JIANG Nengzhi1, TIAN Xiangjuan1()   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    2. Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261031, China
  • Received:2024-04-19 Published:2024-05-25 Online:2024-06-12
  • Contact: TIAN Xiangjuan, E-mail: xiangjuanti@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (General)(ZR2021MC037);Science and Technology Development Program (Soft Science) Project of Weifang City(2023RKX134);Educational Development Research Micro-project of Shandong(FH032)

摘要:

目的 探讨D型与非D型人格冠心病患者健康赋权、感知控制和经验性回避的差异。

方法 2022年1月至10月,方便选取山东第二医科大学附属医院195例冠心病患者。采用D型人格量表、中文版赋权感知量表(CV-PPES)、修订版控制态度量表(CAS-R)和接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-II)对患者进行问卷调查。

结果 共回收有效问卷185份,其中D型人格患者68例,非D型117例。与非D型患者相比,D型患者的消极情感与社交抑制得分均显著较高(|t| > 9.783, P < 0.001)。D型患者在CV-PPES总分及信息、决策、个体化和自我管理4个维度分均显著低于非D型患者(t > 5.843, P < 0.001)。D型患者CAS-R评分明显低于非D型患者(t = 2.858, P = 0.005),AAQ-II评分显著高于非D型患者(t = -9.414, P < 0.001)。

结论 与非D型人格比较,D型人格冠心病患者的健康赋权和感知控制水平较低,而经验性回避水平较高,可能会对健康行为产生消极影响。

关键词: 冠心病, D型人格, 健康赋权, 感知控制, 经验性回避

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the differences in health empowerment, perceived control and experiential avoidance between patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with type D personality and non-type D personality.

Methods From January to October, 2022, using the convenient sampling method, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 195 patients with CHD from Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University. Assessment tools included Type D Personality Scale, Chinese Version of Patient Perception Empowerment Scale (CV-PPES), Control Attitudes Scale-Revised (CAS-R) and Acceptance Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II).

Results A total of 185 effective questionnaires were returned, and 68 patients with type D personality. Compared with the patients with non-type D personality, the scores of negative affectivity and social inhibition were higher (|t| > 9.783, P < 0.001), the total score of CV-PPES and the scores of four dimensions (information, decision, individual and self-management) were lower (t > 5.843, P < 0.001), the score of CAS-R was lower (t = 2.858, P= 0.005), and the score of AAQ-II was higher (t = -9.414, P < 0.001) in CHD patients with type D personality.

Conclusion Compared with non-D-type patients, CHD patients with D-type personality exhibit lower levels of health empowerment and perceived control, and higher level of experiential avoidance, which may negatively impact on health behaviors.

Key words: coronary heart disease, type D personality, health empowerment, perceived control, experiential avoidance

中图分类号: