手持型肌力测定仪测量下肢肌力的信度与效度

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.05.017

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 572-574.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.05.017

手持型肌力测定仪测量下肢肌力的信度与效度

贾延兵, 刘浩², 熊愿, 王楚珊, 洪文侠, 钟林森³, 黄战武³, 张世杰³

1.广东省工伤康复医院,a.物理治疗科;b.粤港运动损伤康复与研究中心,广东广州市 510440;
2.宜兴九如城康复医院康复治疗部,江苏宜兴市 214200;
3.东莞市康复医院物理治疗科,广东东莞市 523119。

收稿日期:2016-09-25 修回日期:2017-01-13 出版日期:2017-05-25 发布日期:2017-05-24
通讯作者: 刘浩(1982-),男,汉族,河南洛阳市人,博士,主管治疗师,主要研究方向：经颅磁刺激、脑神经科学、神经康复及骨科康复。E-mail: liuhao0909@163.com。
作者简介:贾延兵(1982-),女,汉族,河南禹州市人,主管治疗师,主要研究方向：烧伤及骨关节损伤的物理治疗。

Reliability and Validity of A Novel Hand-held Dynamometer for Muscles Strength of Lower Extremities

JIA Yan-bing, LIU Hao², XIONG Yuan, WANG Chu-shan, HONG Wen-xia, ZHONG Lin-sen³, HUANG Zhan-wu³, ZHANG Shi-jie³

1. a. Department of Physical Therapy; b. Guangdong-Hongkong Joint Sports Injury Rehabilitation and Research Center, Guangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510440, China;
2. Rehabilitation Department, JORU Rehabilitation Hospital, Yixing, Jiangsu 214200, China;
3. Department of Physical Therapy, Dongguan Rehabilitation Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong 523119, China

Received:2016-09-25 Revised:2017-01-13 Published:2017-05-25 Online:2017-05-24
Contact: LIU Hao. E-mail: liuhao0909@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的测试手持型肌力测定仪OE-210测定下肢肌力的信度与效度。方法 2016年3月1日至4月30日,正常青年人38名,由2位治疗师分别使用OE-210进行股四头肌和腘绳肌肌力测定,其中一位治疗师在3 d后重复测试1次。受试者1 d后接受下肢等速肌力测试。计算组内相关系数(ICC),OE-210测试结果与等速测试结果进行Pearson相关分析。结果同一测试者重复测量ICC=0.718~0.924;不同测试者间ICC=0.784~0.870。OE-210测试结果与等速测试峰力矩正显著相关性(P<0.001),其中股四头肌轻中度相关(r=0.270~0.413),腘绳肌高度相关(r=0.582~0.668)。结论 OE-210肌力测定仪测试下肢股四头肌、腘绳肌的信度良好,而确保其使用效度的条件尚需进一步研究。

关键词: 手持型肌力测定仪, 信度, 效度, 下肢, 肌力

Abstract: Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of a novel hand-held dynamometer, OE-210, for muscles strength of lower extremities. Methods From March 1st to August 30th, 2016, 38 young adults were tested the muscle strength of quadriceps and hamstrings with OE-210 dynamometer by 2 rators, and were retested by one of the raters three days later. The isokinetic test was also conducted on all the subjects one day afterwards. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of OE-210 test Results and the Pearson's correlation coefficient between Results of OE-210 and isokinetic test were calculated. Results The ICC of test-retest were 0.718 to 0.924, and the ICC of inter-rater were 0.784 to 0.870. The correlation between muscle performance measured with 2 tools were significant (P<0.001), that was light to medium on quadriceps (r=0.270-0.413), and strong on hamstrings (r=0.582-0.668). Conclusion OE-210 dynamometer was reliable for muscle strength measurement on quadriceps and hamstrings, and the conditions for valid application need further research.

Key words: hand-held dynamometer, reliability, validity, lower extremity, muscle strength

中图分类号:

R493

贾延兵, 刘浩, 熊愿, 王楚珊, 洪文侠, 钟林森, 黄战武, 张世杰. 手持型肌力测定仪测量下肢肌力的信度与效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(5): 572-574.

JIA Yan-bing, LIU Hao, XIONG Yuan, WANG Chu-shan, HONG Wen-xia, ZHONG Lin-sen, HUANG Zhan-wu, ZHANG Shi-jie. Reliability and Validity of A Novel Hand-held Dynamometer for Muscles Strength of Lower Extremities[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2017, 23(5): 572-574.

参考文献

[1] Sapega AA. Muscle performance evaluation in orthopaedic practice [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1990, 72(10): 1562-1574.
[2] Maffiuletti NA. Assessment of hip and knee muscle function in orthopaedic practice and research [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(1): 220-229.
[3] Awatani T, Mori S, Shinohara J, et al. Same-session and between-day intra-rater reliability of hand-held dynamometer measurements of isometric shoulder extensor strength [J]. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2016, 28(3): 936-939.
[4] Awatani T, Morikita I, Shinohara J, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of isometric shoulder extensor and internal rotator strength measurements performed using a hand-held dynamometer [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(11): 3054-3059.
[5] Kim SG, Lim DH, Cho YH. Analysis of the reliability of the make test in young adults by using a hand-held dynamometer [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(8): 2238-2240.
[6] Alfuth M, Hahm MM. Reliability, comparability, and validity of foot inversion and eversion strength measurements using a hand-held dynamometer [J]. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2016, 11(1): 72-84.
[7] 黄志平,尹彦,刘敏,等. 等速肌力测试与训练技术的研究进展[J]. 体育科技, 2011, 32(4): 52-58.
[8] Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice [M]. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health, 2009: 585-618.
[9] Muff G, Dufour S, Meyer A, et al. Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(9): 2445-2451.
[10] Whiteley R, Jacobsen P, Prior S, et al. Correlation of isokinetic and novel hand-held dynamometry measures of knee flexion and extension strength testing [J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2012, 15(5): 444-450.
[11] Katoh M, Isozaki K. Reliability of isometric knee extension muscle strength measurements of healthy elderly subjects made with a hand-held dynamometer and a belt [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(12): 1855-1859.
[12] Leiri A, Tushima E, Ishida K, et al. Reliability of measurements of hip abduction strength obtained with a hand-held dynamometer [J]. Physiother Theory Pract, 2015, 31(2): 146-152.
[13] Stark T, Walker B, Phillips JK, et al. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review [J]. PM R, 2011, 3(5): 472-479.
[14] 朴春花,桑德春,牧野健一郎,等. 脑卒中患者偏瘫侧肌力测定的信度和效度——手持式测力仪测定规则[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2008, 30(7): 456-459.
[15] Nollet F, Beelen A. Strength assessment in postpolio syndrome: validity of a hand-held dynamometer in detecting change [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999, 80(10): 1316-1323.

手持型肌力测定仪测量下肢肌力的信度与效度

Reliability and Validity of A Novel Hand-held Dynamometer for Muscles Strength of Lower Extremities

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	耿立蒙, 刘聪聪, 李玲, 吕攀攀, 王鑫, 刘芳. 运用心理教育量表(第3版)评估孤独症谱系障碍儿童心理行为特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1035-1039.
[2]	王亚楠, 刘西花. 脑卒中偏瘫患者主观和客观平衡功能测量的相关性及预测效能[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 890-895.
[3]	易琦峰, 黄卓尔, 杨国莉, 谢丽华, 谢胜锋, 吴小霞, 严谨. 在职医护人员呼吸康复培训知识需求问卷的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 985-992.
[4]	李梦瑜, 宋雅, 徐坚. 慢性颈痛患者健康体适能的特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 756-760.
[5]	王一吉, 周红俊, 何泽佳, 刘根林, 郑樱, 郝春霞, 卫波, 康海琼, 张缨, 逯晓蕾, 袁媛, 蒙倩茹. 不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动功能对称性与步态对称性的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 639-645.
[6]	谭晓欢, 姜桂萍, 黄芯怡, 王丹丹, 张磊, 卜庆国, 吴雪萍. 社区高龄老年人下肢肌力与步速的关系：柔韧和动态平衡的链式中介作用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 646-653.
[7]	张倩, 孙新亭. 视频镜像训练对脑卒中恢复期患者下肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 703-707.
[8]	李俊毅, 陈泽华, 吴祖贵, 王毅, 李聪聪, 王帅, 陈伟健, 叶子璇, 沈星星, 向瑞安, 刘文刚, 许学猛. 超声回声强度评价膝骨关节炎患者股四头肌质量的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 738-744.
[9]	赵雅娴, 唐芷晴, 孙新亭, 王荣荣, 刘天昊, 张皓. 不同强度穿戴式下肢康复机器人训练对脑卒中后下肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 497-503.
[10]	金振华, 陈玲, 刘勇. 基于自我效能理论的数字化步行功能训练对脑卒中患者下肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 504-509.
[11]	潘海鸿, 李泰薇, 刘远才, 卢美铭, 陈琳. 简易滑动式腿部康复设备机构设计与分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 396-401.
[12]	黄凯琪, 辛榕, 凌耿强, 王朴. 重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后下肢运动功能障碍的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 286-293.
[13]	邱晓, 凌骏麒, 从洋洋, 白玉龙. 3D扫描容积法评定上肢远端体积的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 364-367.
[14]	马启寿, 李中元, 符卫卫, 林茜. 重复经颅磁刺激对恢复期脑卒中患者步行的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(2): 167-173.
[15]	沈星星, 熊玉玲, 陈伟健, 李聪聪, 李俊毅, 王帅, 章家皓, 向瑞安, 陈佳浩, 刘文刚, 许学猛. 慢性颈痛患者颈肩部肌肉性能差异及其与疼痛、体质量指数的相关性[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1420-1428.