《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2015, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (08): 879-882.

• 特稿 • 上一篇    下一篇

脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准检查表最新修订及解读

王一吉1,2a，周红俊1,2a，李建军1,2b，刘根林1,2a，郑樱1,2a，郝春霞1,2a，张缨1,2a，卫波1,2a，康海琼1,2a，逯晓蕾1,2a，袁媛1,2a   

  1. 1.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市100068；2.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院，a.脊髓损伤康复科，b.脊柱脊髓损伤功能重建科，北京市100068。作者简介：王一吉(1982-)，男，汉族，湖南衡阳市人，硕士，主治医师，主要研究方向：脊髓损伤康复。通讯作者：周红俊。E-mail: zh87569303@qq.com。
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2015-08-25 发布日期:2015-08-25

Latest Edition and Interpretation of International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord InjuryWorksheet

WANG Yi- ji1,2a, ZHOU Hong- jun1,2a, LI Jian- jun1,2b, LIU Gen- lin1,2a, ZHENG Ying1,2a, HAO Chun- xia1,2a, ZHANG Ying1,2a, WEI Bo1,2a, KANG Hai-qiong1,2a, LU Xiao-lei1,2a, YUAN Yuan1,2a   

  1. 1.Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China; 2. a. Department of Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, b. Department of Spinal and Neural Function Reconstruction, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2015-08-25 Online:2015-08-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的探讨最新版脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI-2013)检查表的修订之处及其意义。方法通过详细对比ASIA 国际标准委员会提供的最新版ISNCSCI-2013 检查表(英文版)与ISNCSCI-2011 检查表(英文版)，找出修订之处，同时根据ISNCSCI-2011 检查表使用体会，分析其修订意义。结果与ISNCSCI-2011 检查表相比，ISNCSCI-2013 共有11 处改动。新版的检查表更便于区分和强调某些条目，同时对某些条目进行了细化。结论ASIA标准委员会根据应用ISNCSCI-2011 检查表的实践体会，对该检查表进行较大的修改，提出了更加科学的记录方法，使之能更加直观、清楚地反映出检查结果。本次修订更有利于脊髓损伤神经功能评估结果的记录和判定。

关键词: 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准, 版本, 修订, 解读

Abstract: Objective To study the modification of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) worksheet (2013 version) and the significance for clinical practice. Methods The latest English version of ISNCSCI worksheet- 2013 was compared with the previous version to find the advantages of current version and analyze its significance according to the experience from using the worksheet-2011. Results 11 modifications were found in ISNCSCI-2013, in which some were just discrimination, some were for emphasis, and the others were detailing. Conclusion The ASIA International Standards Committee made prudent modifications according to the practical experience of the ISNCSCI-2011 to make the worksheet more scientific and clear for recording. The modification will be more beneficial to record and determine the evaluation results of neurological examination of spinal cord injury in clinical practice.

Key words: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, version, modification, interpretation