《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2012, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 463-465.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种镇痛方法在膝关节松解术后早期康复治疗中的比较

罗克金1，李彦平2，王强3,4   

  1. 1.北京市房山区第一医院麻醉科，北京市 102400；2.首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院麻醉科，北京市 100050；3.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院，北京市 100068；4.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市 100068。
  • 收稿日期:2012-03-16 修回日期:2012-03-24 出版日期:2012-05-25 发布日期:2012-05-25

Comparison of Two Analgesia in Early Rehabilitation on Patients after Knee Arthrolysis

LUO Ke-jin, LI Yan-ping, WANG Qiang.   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Fangshan District No.1 Hospital, Beijing 102400, China
  • Received:2012-03-16 Revised:2012-03-24 Published:2012-05-25 Online:2012-05-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的比较连续股神经阻滞和静脉患者自控镇痛泵在膝关节松解术后的镇痛效果及对康复训练的影响。方法选择拟行单侧膝关节松解术的患者60 例，随机分成连续股神经阻滞组(CFNB组，n=30)和静脉镇痛泵组(IPCA组，n=30)。CFNB组在术后实施股神经鞘中留置导管，IPCA组在术后连接静脉镇痛泵。所有患者在术后6 h、24 h、30 h、48 h 先行被动运动训练，然后行主动运动训练。CFNB 组在训练前经留置导管注射0.25%罗哌卡因20 ml，IPCA组通过镇痛泵持续静脉输注镇痛药物(舒芬太尼200~250 μg 和氯胺酮100 mg，生理盐水稀释至100 ml)。记录康复训练中的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、患肢主动关节屈曲活动度，记录两组副作用的发生情况。结果CFNB组VAS 评分显著低于IPCA组(P<0.001)，恶心呕吐及皮肤瘙痒的发生率低于IPCA组(P<0.05)，患肢主动关节活动度显著大于IPCA组(P<0.001)。结论应用连续股神经阻滞镇痛效果好，副作用少，是一种理想的用于膝关节松解术后康复训练的镇痛方法。

关键词: 膝关节, 强直, 关节松解术, 连续股神经阻滞, 静脉患者自控镇痛, 康复

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) and intravenous patient controlled analgesia(IPCA) on postoperative analgesia and rehabilitation therapy for patients after knee arthrolysis. Methods 60 patients were randomly allocatedinto CFNB group (n=30) in which patients received CFNB via a catheter inserted in femoral sheath and IPCA group (n=30) in which patientsreceived IPCA via an intravenous infusion pump contained with analgesics. All patients were successively offered passive rehabilitationtherapy and active rehabilitation therapy at 6, 24, 30, and 48 h post-operation. An injection of 50 mg ropivacaine (0.25%) was administratedvia the catheter before rehabilitation therapy in CFNB group. Analgesics (200~250 μg sufentanil and 100 mg ketamine in 100 ml normalsaline) were transfused intravenously at a constant rate during the whole postoperative period in group IPCA. Visual Analogue Score(VAS), active flexion angle (AFA) of suffered knee joint, and side effects related to CFNB or IPCA were recorded. Results The VAS scoreand the side effect rate were lower in CFNB group than in IPCA group (P<0.05). And the AFA was significantly larger in CFNB group thanin IPCA group (P<0.001). Conclusion CFNB is a safe and beneficial analgesia for patients in postoperative rehabilitation.

Key words: knee, stiffness, arthrolysis, continuous femoral nerve block, intravenous patient controlled analgesia, rehabilitation