《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2006, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03): 198-200.

• 专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

某市2004级大学生社会支持状况调查研究

何心展1; 尤海燕2   

  1. 1.宁波工程学院 浙江宁波市 315016;2.宁波大学师范学院 浙江宁波市 315211
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-05 出版日期:2006-03-25 发布日期:2006-03-25

Social Support to Sophomore in Ningbo City:4 University Survey in 2005

HEXin-zhan, YOUHai-yan   

  1. Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315016, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2006-01-05 Published:2006-03-25 Online:2006-03-25

PDF (PC)

被引次数

41

摘要： 目的了解大学生获得社会支持的情况。方法采用社会支持评定量表(SSRS),对某市4所不同录取批次高校400名2004级大学生进行社会支持情况调查。结果和结论本市生源大学生和其他地区生源大学生的社会支持状况没有显著性差异;不同批次高校大学生在支持利用度方面存在显著性差异,第三批次大学生得分最高,第四批次大学生得分最低;来自乡村大学生的主观支持得分高于来自城市的大学生,在客观支持和支持利用度上没有显著性差异;女生主观支持和支持利用度得分高于男生,在客观支持得分上没有显著性差异;不同专业大学生在客观支持和支持利用度得分上没有显著性差异,但管理类大学生的主观支持得分高于工科、理科和文科大学生;大学生在急难状况时,家庭、朋友和同学是他们获得经济等实际支持和精神支持的最主要社会源,从学校和各种社会组织获得的支持相对较少。

关键词: 大学生, 社会支持, 主观支持, 客观支持, 支持利用度

Abstract: ObjectiveTo survey the social support to students in university.Methods400 college students of grade 2004 from 4 different colleges in Ningbo were tested with the Social Support Rating Scale(SSRS).Results and ConclusionThere were no significant differences among students from Ningbo and students from the other regions.Students from different level colleges had different scores in utilization of support,students from the third level college had the highest scores while students from the forth level had the lowest scores.College students from countries scored higher than students from cities in subjective support,but there were no significant differences in objective support and the utilization of support.Female students had higher scores in subjective support and utilization of support than males while had no significant differences in objective support.Students with different majors had no significant differences in objective support and utilization of support,while concerning subjective support,students from management departments had the highest scores,students from arts departments had the lowest scores.In case of emergency,college students mainly received economic support and mental support from their families,friends and classmates while received less support from various organizations both of colleges and society.

Key words: sophomore, social support, objective support, subjective support, utilization of support