《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2005, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (09): 703-705.

• 专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表的信度与效度分析

张庆苏 ; 纪树荣 ; 李胜利 ; 何怡 ; 贾革红 ; 秦江天 ; 卫冬洁 ; 田鸿   

  1. 1.首都医科大学康复医学院 北京市 100068;2.北京博爱医院听力语言科 北京市 100068
  • 收稿日期:2005-01-26 出版日期:2005-09-25 发布日期:2005-09-25

Reliability and validity of Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center Standard Aphasia Examination

ZHANG Qing-su, JI Shu-rong, LI Sheng-li, et al   

  1. Department of Audiology and Speech Therapy, Beijing Charity Hospital, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2005-01-26 Published:2005-09-25 Online:2005-09-25

摘要: 目的研究“中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表”(CRRCAE)在评测脑血管疾病失语症患者中的信度和效度。方法运用CRRCAE量表对20例失语症患者进行量表的信度和效度分析,引用组内相关系数(interclass correlation coeffi-cients)表示量表的可信度;将CRRCAE量表的总分和分项目测验同西方失语症量表(Western APhasia Battery,WAB)的失语症指数和分测验进行量表的效度研究。结果CRRCAE量表总评分组内相关系数>0.9;CRRCAE的总评分同WAB的失语症指数有较高的相关性(r=0.948,P<0.01);其敏感效应尺度为0.94。结论CRRCAE具有良好的信度和敏感度,其总分在反映失语症严重程度方面具有较好的有效性,可以作为在失语症患者的临床和语言康复中量化的指标。

关键词: 中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表, 失语症, 信度, 效度

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the reliability and validity of Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center Standard Aphasia Examination (CRRCAE) among patients with aphasia after cerebral injury. Methods40 patients were measured using the CRRCAE. For reliability, interclass correlation coefficients were analyzed. For validity, the correlation coefficients of the aphasia quotients and 4 items of CRRCAE and Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) were analyzed.ResultsThe interclass correlation coefficients>0.9, while the Cronbach α of total scale was 0.9411, the scale of the comprehension was 0.8677,the scale of express was 0.8889. CRRCAE had positive relationship with WAB(with the aphasia quotients, r=0.948,P<0.01). The effect size statistics scale was 0.94.ConclusionCRRCAE shows a good retest reliability and good internal consistency. The total scale of CRRCAE can be correlated with serious level of aphasia effectively.

Key words: Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center Standard Aphasia Examination (CRRCAE), aphasia, reliability, validity