《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2003, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (09): 560-561.

• 骨科健康 • 上一篇    下一篇

卧式间歇牵引与坐式持续牵引治疗颈椎病疗效比较

夏新蜀; 党元秀; 雷飚; 胡渝萍   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院康复医学科 重庆市 400016
  • 收稿日期:2003-06-09 出版日期:2003-09-25 发布日期:2003-09-25

Comparison of the therapeutic effect of bed intermittent traction and sitting sustained traction on cervical spondylosis

XIA Xin-shu,DANG Yuan-xiu, LEI Biao, et al   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, FirstHospital Affiliated to Chongqing University of Medical Science, Chongqing 400016,China
  • Received:2003-06-09 Published:2003-09-25 Online:2003-09-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的观察卧式间歇牵引与坐式持续牵引治疗颈椎病的疗效。方法64例颈椎病患者随机分为卧式间歇牵引组与坐式持续牵引组,各32例。两组患者分别行卧式间歇牵引与坐式持续牵引治疗,牵引后均配合电脑中频电治疗,疗程结束后进行疗效评定及组间比较。结果两组显效率、有效率分别为59.38%、96.88%和46.88%、93.75%,组间比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论卧式间歇牵引及坐式持续牵引治疗均是治疗颈椎病的有效方法。

关键词: 颈椎病, 卧式间歇牵引, 坐式持续牵引

Abstract: ObjectiveTo observe the therapeutic effects of bed intermittent traction and sitting sustained traction on cervical spondylosis.Methods64 patients were randomly divided into two groups, bed intermittent traction group(n=32)and sitting sustained traction group(n=32). Patients were treated with bed intermittent traction and sitting sustained traction combined with medium frequency electrostimulation. After the treatment, the therapeutic effects were assessed and compared. ResultsThe rate of very efficiency and efficiency of two groups was 59.38%, 96.88% and 46.88%, 93.75%, there was no significant difference in two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsThe bed intermittent traction and the sitting sustained traction are efficiency for treating the cervical spondylosis.

Key words: cervical spondylosis, bed intermittent traction, sitting sustained traction