基于ICD-11和ICF的智力残疾术语、诊断和分类研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.01.001

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 1-5.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.01.001

• 专题 • 下一篇

基于ICD-11和ICF的智力残疾术语、诊断和分类研究

邹敏^1,2,3, 孙宏伟^1,2,3, 邱卓英^1,2,4,5, 王胜男^1,2,3

1. 中国ICF研究院,山东潍坊市 261053;
2. 世界卫生组织国际分类家族中国合作中心,北京市 100068;
3. 潍坊医学院心理学系,山东潍坊市 261053;
4. 中国康复研究中心康复信息研究所,北京市 100068;
5.中国康复科学所,北京市 100068

收稿日期:2019-01-06 修回日期:2019-01-07 出版日期:2019-01-25 发布日期:2019-02-18
通讯作者: 邱卓英。E-mail: qiutiger@hotmail.com
作者简介:邹敏(1982-),女,汉族,山东威海市人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向：发展与教育心理学、康复心理学、康复咨询学。
基金资助:
1.中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(重大科学研究引导基金项目)(No. 2017CZ-7; No. 2018CZ-4); 2.证据科学教育部重点实验室(中国政法大学)开放基金资助课题(No. 2018KFKT07)

Terminology, Diagnosis and Classification of Intellectual Disability Using WHO ICD-11 and ICF

ZOU Min^1,2,3, SUN Hong-wei^1,2,3, QIU Zhuo-ying^1,2,4,5, WANG Sheng-nan^1,2,3

1. China Academy of ICF, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
2. WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China;
3. Psychology Department of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
4. Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China;
5. China Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Beijing 100068, China

Received:2019-01-06 Revised:2019-01-07 Published:2019-01-25 Online:2019-02-18
Contact: QIU Zhuo-ying. E-mail: qiutiger@hotmail.com
Supported by:
National Special Fund Projects of Based Research of Public Benefits for Institutes at Central Governmental Level (Leading Project of Major Scientific Research) (No. 2017CZ-7; No. 2018CZ-4) and Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law, Ministry of Education) (No. 2018KFKT07)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的基于ICD-11和ICF,探讨当代智力残疾的术语和命名、诊断、分类架构和评定方法。
方法采用ICD-11与ICF理论与方法,分析当代智力残疾的命名与术语、诊断标准、分类体系以及评定方法。
结果应用ICD-11和ICF分别从疾病与功能的角度建立智力残疾的术语、疾病和功能诊断标准以及评定方法。ICD-11从疾病分类的角度将智力残疾命名为智力发育障碍,属于精神、行为或神经发育障碍的一个亚类。ICF将智力残疾确定为智力功能障碍(b117)和适应性行为功能障碍(d1~d9)。两种分类标准均确认智力残疾的发生年龄在18岁之前。
结论基于ICD-11与ICF建立了智力残疾的命名和术语体系、分类架构、疾病和功能诊断标准与评定方法,为构建智力残疾康复服务体系提供理论支持与标准化工具。

关键词: 智力残疾, 术语, 诊断, 分类

Abstract: Objective To review the nomenclature and terminology, diagnostic criteria, classification and evaluation of intellectual disability using WHO ICD-11 and ICF.
Methods The theories and approaches of ICD-11 and ICF were adopted to analyze the nomenclature and terminology, diagnostic criteria, classification and evaluation of intellectual disability.
Results ICD-11 and ICF had established the nomenclature and terminology, diagnostic criteria, classification and evaluation of intellectual disability from the perspectives of content model of ICD-11 and functioning of ICF respectively. Intellectual disability had used nomenclature of disorder of intellectual development and one of sub-categories of mental, behavioral or neurodevelopmental disorders. Intellectual disability was also defined as both impairment of intellectual function (b117) and functional limitation of adaptive behaviors (d1-d9) using ICF. Occurrence age of intellectual disability was before 18 years old for diagnostic criteria of ICD-11 and ICF.
Conclusion The nomenclature and terminology, diagnostic criteria and classifications of intellectual disability have been reviewed and updated using the theories and approaches of ICD-11 and ICF. It provides theoretical supports, approaches, and standardized tools for the development of rehabilitation service for people with intellectual disability.

Key words: intellectual disability, terminology, diagnosis, classification

中图分类号:

R749

邹敏, 孙宏伟, 邱卓英, 王胜男. 基于ICD-11和ICF的智力残疾术语、诊断和分类研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(1): 1-5.

ZOU Min, SUN Hong-wei, QIU Zhuo-ying, WANG Sheng-nan. Terminology, Diagnosis and Classification of Intellectual Disability Using WHO ICD-11 and ICF[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(1): 1-5.

参考文献

[1] 世界卫生组织. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(国际中文增补版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2015.
[2] Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Rauch A, et al.ICF核心分类组合临床实践手册[M]. 邱卓英,励建安,吴弦光,译. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2013.
[3] Katz G, Lazcano-Ponce E.Intellectual disability: definition, etiological factors, classification, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis[J]. Salud Publica Mex, 2008, 50(Suppl 2): 132-141.
[4] American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Definition of intellectual disability [EB/OL]. [2018-08-17]. http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition
[5] 陈静, Garralda M E, 程文红. ICD-11精神与行为障碍(草案)关于神经发育障碍诊断标准的进展[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2017, 50(6): 411-413.
[6] World Health Organization.International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision [EB/OL]. [2018-08-17].https://icd.who.int/browse11
[7] Carulla L S, Reed G M, Vaez Azizi L M, et al. Intellectual developmental disorders: towards a new name, definition and framework for “mental retardation/intellectual disability” in ICD-11[J]. World Psychiatry, 2013, 10(3): 175-180.
[8] First M.DSM-5鉴别诊断手册[M]. 张道龙,译. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2016.
[9] American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) [M]. Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
[10] Tassé M J, Schalock R L, Balboni G, et al.The construct of adaptive behavior: its conceptualization, measurement, and use in the field of intellectual disability[J]. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil, 2012, 117(4): 291-303.
[11] Arias B, Angel Verdugo M, Navas P, et al.Factor structure of the construct of adaptive behavior in children with and without intellectual disability[J]. Int J Clin Health Psychol, 2013, 13(2): 155-166.
[12] Mefford H C, Batshaw M L, Hoffman E P.Genomics, intellectual disability and autism[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366(23): 733-743.
[13] 杨兰,于明. ICD-11的模型与修订进展[J]. 中国病案, 2015, 16(5): 20-25.
[14] Baird G.Classification of diseases and the neurodevelopmental disorders: the challenge for DSM-5 and ICD-11[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2013, 55(3): 200-201.
[15] 邱卓英,李欣,刘冯铂,等. 基于ICF的智力残疾模式、测量方法及社会支持系统研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 373-377.
[16] 邱卓英,黎东晓,李欣,等. 当代智力残疾测量与统计方法和社会支持与服务体系研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 383-388.
[17] Schalock R L, Borthwick-Duffy S A, Bradley V J, et al. Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification and Systems of Supports[M]. Washington D.C.: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2010.
[18] Schalock R L, Luckasson R A, Shogren K A, et al.The renaming of mental retardation: understanding the change to the term intellectual disability[J]. Intellect Dev Disabil, 2007, 45(2): 116-124.
[19] Reiss S.A mindful approach to mental retardation[J]. J Soc Issues, 2000, 56(1): 65-80.
[20] Simpson M.Developmental concept of idiocy[J]. Intellect Dev Disabil, 2007, 45(1): 23-32.
[21] 许家成. “智力障碍”定义的新演化——以“功能”、“支持”与“生活质量”为导向的新趋势[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2003(4): 19-23.
[22] 冬雪. 美国智力障碍定义的演变及其启示[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2011(5): 34-39.
[23] Wehmeyer M L.Disability, disorder, and identity[J]. Intellect Dev Disabil, 2013, 51(2): 122-126.
[24] Scior K.Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: a systematic review[J]. Res Dev Disabi, 2011, 32(6): 2164-2182.
[25] Wu L, Qiu Z, Wong D, et al.The research on the status, rehabilitation, education, vocational development, social integration and support services related to intellectual disability in China[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2010, 31: 1216-1222.
[26] Wallace S J, Worrall L, Rose T, et al.Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2017. [Epub ahead of print]
[27] Tasse M J, Luckasson R, Nygren M.AAIDD proposed recommendations for ICD-11 and the condition previously known as mental retardation[J]. Intellect Dev Disabil, 2013, 51(2): 127-131.

基于ICD-11和ICF的智力残疾术语、诊断和分类研究

Terminology, Diagnosis and Classification of Intellectual Disability Using WHO ICD-11 and ICF

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	朱婷, 张玉红. 基于ICF和Hauenstein教育目标分类理论构建特殊音乐教育目标[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1110-1116.
[2]	刘宁, 刘雨泉, 祝斌, 于凌佳, 谭海宁, 杨雍, 李想. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准国内应用情况的文献计量学研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 808-815.
[3]	袁媛, 杨剑. 社区老年人身体活动融合慢性病管理的健康效益：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 541-550.
[4]	曹雨菡, 李瑾, 何民, 王丹, 陈伟. 基于ICF冠心病患者远程康复的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 433-442.
[5]	田俊夫, 杨剑. 物质滥用导致精神行为障碍有氧运动康复的健康和功能效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 443-451.
[6]	张雪茹, 陈思齐, 胡伟斌, 刘巧云. 基于ICF-CY的残疾儿童综合性口语沟通功能调查[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 320-325.
[7]	徐悦莹, 郑洁皎, 高文, 丁建伟, 陈茜. 基于WHO-FICs作业治疗改善脑卒中上肢功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(2): 140-150.
[8]	宋贝贝, 刘辉, 柏开祥. 基于ICF-CY残疾儿童青少年运动功能评价量表内容和心理测量指标的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(2): 182-192.
[9]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于ICD-11和ICF的活动和参与与生活质量测量工具的内容比较[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1454-1464.
[10]	王玉昌, 吴月, 付亏杰, 王正辉, 王亚洲, 郭学军, 庞伟. 基于ICF-CY平衡姿态悬吊治疗方案的设计[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(11): 1316-1326.
[11]	叶绿, 王斌, 邱服冰. 大学生身体活动的心理行为健康和功能效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(1): 38-47.
[12]	刘辉,杨剑,曹航,贾绍辉. 基于WHO-FICs架构智力残疾儿童青少年身体活动与运动康复的健康结局：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(9): 993-1002.
[13]	郭彤彤,杨剑,吴铭,郭正茂. 电竞活动对青少年健康和功能的影响及康复干预的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(8): 879-888.
[14]	刘根林,周红俊,李建军,卫波,郑樱,郝春霞,张缨,王一吉,康海琼,逯晓蕾,袁媛,蒙倩茹. 伴并发症脊髓损伤的神经学分类研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(8): 934-938.
[15]	杨晓龙,杨亚茹,邱服冰,郭凤宜,黄锦文,曹磊,张甜甜,宋为群. 基于ICF的作业治疗：理论架构与方法体系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(6): 621-629.