《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (12): 1193-1195.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

残疾人与非残疾人工作疲劳感比较

熊国星1，徐文磊2，孟月3，胡珊珊4，孙知寒5，赵悌尊5   

  1. 1.首都医科大学公共卫生与家庭医学学院康复医学教研室，北京市 100069；2.人力资源和社会保障部工伤保险司，北京市 100716；3. 首都医科大学公共卫生与家庭医学学院预防医学专业2005 级，北京市 100069；4. 首都医科大学公共卫生与家庭医学学院预防医学专业2006级，北京市 100069；5. 中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院，北京市 100068。
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-20 修回日期:2011-07-11 出版日期:2011-12-25 发布日期:2011-12-25

Comparision on Work Fatigue between the Disabled and the Healthy

XIONG Guo-xing, XU Wen-lei, MENG Yue, et al.   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2011-04-20 Revised:2011-07-11 Published:2011-12-25 Online:2011-12-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的调查残疾人及非残疾人工作疲劳感，了解残疾人的工作抗压能力，为我国残疾人就业政策的制定及其职业康复提供依据。方法采用疲劳影响量表(FIS)随机对东中西3省各1个公司的每个车间及岗位的280名员工(包括残疾人220名，非残疾人60名)进行调查。结果残疾人的总体工作疲劳度与非残疾人比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)，在认知、身体、社会心理疲劳3个维度上也是如此。进一步对FIS量表的40个条目比较后发现，工作的残疾人在社会心理功能层面的疲劳有4个条目较非残疾人表现得更明显(P<0.05)。结论残疾人具有不低于非残疾人的工作抗压能力，完全可以胜任工作，残疾人及其家属、雇主都应该对其就业更有信心，国家政策应该提供更加强有力的保障。

关键词: 就业质量, 职业康复, 抗压能力

Abstract: Objective To investigate the status of work fatigue of the disabled and the healthy so that we get to know their employment quality and compressive strength, and then provide the theory basis for the national policy formulation and vocational rehabilitation. Methods We randomly investigated 280 employees (220 disabled, 60 healthy people) in 3 companies from 3 provinces with Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS). Results There was no statistically significant difference between disabled and healthy people about work fatigue, and also that of 3 domains including psycho-social, cognitive and physical activity. After comparison of 40 items on FIS，the disabled had higher fatigue than that of the healthy in 4 items which belonged to psycho-social domain (P<0.05). Conclusion Disabled people are no less than healthy people in compression capability and working capability. They should believe in themselves, and their family and the employees should have more confidence about their work capability than before. Government should provide some support with them on job retention.

Key words: quality of employment, vocational rehabilitation, compressive strength