《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (12): 1116-1118.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

社区康复肢体残疾功能评定表对脑卒中偏瘫疗效的评定

桑德春1,2，纪树荣1,2，张缨1,2，范晓华1,2，金萍3   

  1. 1.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市 100068；2.中国康复研究中心，北京市 100068；3.北京残疾人康复服务指导中心，北京市 100028。
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-12 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-12-25 发布日期:2011-12-25

Application of Community Extremity Impairment Assessment Schedule in Community Rehabilitation for Stroke

SANG De-chun, JI Shu-rong, ZHANG Ying, et al.   

  1. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Charity Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Centre, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2011-08-12 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2011-12-25 Online:2011-12-25

PDF (PC)

被引次数

6

摘要： 目的观察社区康复肢体残疾功能评定表的效度。方法313例社区脑卒中偏瘫患者分为康复组和对照组，康复组进行康复治疗3个月，对照组仅做定期跟踪。分别在治疗前、治疗1、2、3个月利用社区康复肢体残疾功能评定表进行评定，并与Fugl-Meyer评定量表比较。结果治疗2个月后，康复组肢体残疾功能及Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分明显优于对照组(P<0.01)；社区康复肢体残疾功能评分与Fugl-Meyer评分正相关(r=0.643,P<0.01)。结论社区康复肢体残疾功能评定表可作为社区康复效果评定使用。

关键词: 社区康复, 社区康复肢体残疾功能评定表, 脑卒中, 偏瘫, 效度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the validity of Community Extremity Disability Assessment Schedule (CEDA) in community rehabilitation. Methods 313 patients with hemiplegia after stroke were divided into rehabilitation group and control group. The rehabilitation group received community-based rehabilitation (CBR) for 3 months, and was assessed with Community Extremity Disability Assessment Schedule before and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after rehabilitation respectively. And it was compared with Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). The control group received the same evaluation only. Results The scores of CEDA and FMA improved more in the rehabilitation group than in the control group 2 months after rehabilitation (P<0.01). The score of CEDA positively correlated with the FMA (r=0.643, P<0.01). Conclusion CEDA can be used to evaluate the efficacy of community rehabilitation.

Key words: community-based rehabilitation, Community Extremity Disability Assessment Schedule, stroke, hemiplegia, validity